Dee Alpert, Publisher
(Well - somebody's got to do it.)

NEWSLETTERS
SPECIAL REPORTS
CONTESTS & AWARDS
SUBMIT A REPORT

 
[NOTE: the following letter by Dee Alpert appeared in EducationNews.org.]

However...nobody, but absolutely nobody is covering the fact that NYS Ed. illegally waived all NCLB accountability for over 100,000 kids

To the Editor:

While I thoroughly applaud the sentiments behind the NY Times' "Leaving Some Children Behind" editorial of 1/27/04, the reality of New York State's No Child Left Behind accountability program shows that a staggeringly-large number of kids with disabilities and "at risk" kids have already been intentionally left behind - and completely left out. What about them? None of the 91 publicly-operated, all-special education schools in New York State have NCLB objective accountability standards or targets; nor do any of the numerous alternative high schools. And no way of holding "small schools" in NY accountable has yet been put into place.

In fact, neither the New York State School for the Blind nor the New York State School for the Deaf - both operated by the New York State Education Department itself - have NCLB School Report Cards or accountability targets and measures in place. Does the Emperor have no clothes, or is this a blatant case of New York saying "do as I say, and not as I do" regarding kids with disabilities? How hypocritical. How cynical. How typical.

Perhaps the US Department of Education and the Congress should devise some way of holding New York State seriously accountable for totally leaving the thousands and thousands of kids in these schools out of meaningful accountability processes. Not to mention holding New York State Education Department officials accountable for publicly acting as though its waivers and omissions don't exist.

But then, perhaps the research, policy and media organizations which have looked at NCLB accountability systems should start holding the NYS Ed. Dept. accountable in some meaningful way for having mis-represented its NCLB accountability process in the first place.

Dee Alpert, Publisher
The Special Education Muckraker
http://www.specialeducationmuckraker.com

References: Commissioner Mills' January 2004 Report to the Regents: http://www.oms.nysed.gov/comm/2004/reg104.htm - kids with disabilities door poorly in current and past SURR Schools (Schools Under Registration Review). SURR Schools are the lowest group of under-performing schools in NY's NCLB accountability system. This memo states that kids with disabilities in poor-performing schools which have, allegedly, been the subject of stringent State Ed. school reform processes, don't do any better than they did before the State stepped in.

Deputy Com'r. Kademus Memo to the Regents, December 2003, Section III, at: http://www.oms.nysed.gov/comm/2004/reg104.htm. Lists the various types of schools which were never included in NY's NCLB accountability process in the first place. These include 91 publicly-operated, all-special education schools; all alternative high schools and all "small" schools. Well over 100,000 students, most of whom are in the groups for whom No Child Left Behind allegedly was written.


NEWSLETTERS
SPECIAL REPORTS
CONTESTS & AWARDS
SUBMIT A REPORT

Copyright 2004, Editor, SpecialEducationMuckraker.com.  If you're having technical problems with this site, contact the webmaster.  For feedback about the content of this site, or to communicate with the muckrakers, contact the editor.